http://askfred.net/Results/results.php?tournament_id=20737&highlight_competitor_id=91067&event_id=85305
During the DEs. I'm just off the left edge here, about to fence the guy in the black headband, Jonathan Jefferies. |
I came in 19th out of 34, which is better than I expected given all the great fencers.
My pre-tournament seeding (based on letter ranks and point standings): 30 out of 34(or about 22% from the bottom, if that makes sense).
My seeding after pools, for DE: 18 out of 34 (47% from bottom). Not bad.
In the pools I won 3, lost 3; scored 23 touches, received 24 touches (indicator of -1, and came in 4th place out of 7). This made my DE seed just one above Aaron Page and one below Mark Blom. All three of us won 3 and lost 3 and had indicators of -1. We differed only in touches scored and received (TS/TR): Aaron 22/23, me 23/24, Mark, 24/25. Apparently that is how they determine seeding when victory percentage and indicators are tied. There's some mechanism for dealing with total ties, but it hasn't happened to me yet.
Since I lost my first DE my experience was mainly that of the pools, which I enjoyed a lot and feel like I learned from—fencing mostly people I didn't know (excepting Don, and Michael Chin, who I've only fenced a couple times). Results, in the order I fenced, if I remember right:
Fencer V/D Score Fencer's V/TS/TR/Ind/Pl
Chin, Michael D 3-5 4 26/21 5 2
Penner, Don V 5-3 0 17/30 -13 4
Ameli, Sean D 1-5 6 30/14 16 1
Lipp, Robert D 3-5 4 24/21 3 3
Leonardini, Barry V 5-2 1 20/27 -7 6
Baldwin, Bob V 5-4 3 24/27 -3 5
Details:
Michael Chin (a "B") is strong and fast, as I knew from before. Usually a foilist, he unfortunately avoided displayed foil habits that are bad in epee. I remember a practice bout with him once where he did a lot of foil-type "mistakes" and I hit him in the arm a lot. Alas, he's learned!
Don I know quite well from practice fencing. He's over 70, very experienced and has taught me a lot. So much I knew how to avoid his tricks and sneak through his defenses. Felt a bit bad about winning though. He's currently a "D", but was once an "A", I think.
Sean Ameli (an "A") is among the best epeeists in the country and one of the very best veteran epeeists. I think his current national standing for veteran epee is #2. He was the top seed going into the tournament, the 3rd seed after the pools, and came in 3rd at the end. He's left-handed and has lots of bouncing speed, and is just all around excellent. Great ability to land arm hits on the outside. Well, I managed *one* point against him. Good enough!
Robert Lipp (an "A"), seeded 10th before the start and 12th after the pools. For some reason I can't recall the details of this bout too well. I did my best, but on at least a couple of occassions my ripostes or remises just barely missed. At one point he launched a fast fleche and I leapt back, retreating so fast I nearly fell down, but managed to land a hit while avoiding his point. That was a nice moment. I was definitely putting my all into it.
Barry Leonardini (a "U") was an interesting, unorthodox fencer. An older guy (over 60 at least, maybe 70 or near it?), his fencing "stance" was "walking around", more or less. He tended to wander back and forth on the strip, often half off the edge and sometimes all the way off. He used a french grip and during my bout with him he switched several times from pommelling and holding it closer to the guard. Whenever I saw him start to pommell I starting using hard beats and he'd soon switch back to a closer grip. At one point I noticed he had rotated the grip so that the wide part of the bell guard was "wrong"—facing up and inside. I figured this was useful for some unorthodox attack, perhaps a very pronated and/or angulated attack? In any case, I won fairly handily, but he was very interesting to fence.
Bob Baldwin (a "D") I fenced last and enjoyed the most. He got the first point or two, then I caught up a bit, then he was up by 2. If I remember right, we were at 2-3, then scored a double, making it 3-4. In a bout to 5 it is quite uncomfortable to find yourself at 3-4. One of my main goals in this tournament was keeping calm, with a relaxed upper body (and hard working legs), avoiding nervousness and making every effort to *enjoy* it all. I also made efforts to be patient, which is harder when you are down in points. All these came together very nicely in this bout. I waited for the right moment—which ended up in somewhat ungraceful close combat, but I managed to land a remise and got a single light hit, making it 4-4. Then the need for calm, relaxed, hard working, patient focus was just as great. After some probing we clashed—a double touch, thrown out because 4-4. Then some more manuevering and presto, I scored a single light with a parry-riposte.
That bout felt great. Not only was I able to keep my cool, but we engaged in all kinds of manuevering and efforts to deceive, set up and break patterns, etc. Unlike with someone like Ameli, I felt I could perceive many of his tactics as they developed, and was able to employ my own, each of us with about equal success.
My first DE bout after the pools was against Jonathan Jefferies, a "B" fencer who I had never met or heard of before. He had seeded 15th, to my 18th, which looked promising. I got some advice from Jeff and Aaron, who had been in his pool. He fleches, they say, pay attention to distance, and give yourself extra. He's good at remises, so avoid direct attacks, Aaron said, try to draw him out with feints and second intentions. Well, I was fairly trounced, losing 4-10. His fleches were good. They were fast but not lightning fast, however he was able to bind up my blade as he fleches in ways I couldn't get out of and still don't quite understand. Ah well, as before I did my best, worked hard, kept calm, avoided nervousness, and enjoyed it.
The rest of the DEs included some exciting bouts. Jim Arrigoni won his first DE against Trip, then went up against Mike Perka—an "A" fencer and one of the best veterans in the region, if not the whole country. Mike would take the lead only to have Jim rally and tie it up, several times. As time was running down Jim was behind 6-7, but got a single light, tying it at 7-7. Time ran out and they went into sudden death. Mike got priority, and after a bit he scored and won. So close! Jim came in 10th overall, earning his "D" rating. Had he beaten Mike he would have come in 7th (assuming he lost the next DE), and earned a "C". Damn he's been getting better and better.
Then there were the DE bouts with Walter Dragonetti, who was 4th seed after the pools. First he fenced Jeff, winning 10-0. Afterward Jeff said "that was totally not fun" and "he was toying with me". Maybe, although watching "Dragon" in further bouts, his style tends to be something like John Varney's—retreating and retreating to his end of the strip, then making a hit. Sometimes that can feel very frustrating. Perhaps that is why some people do it. Anyway, after Jeff, Dragonetti beat Gareth Mason, who I don't know.
Then, in the Final 8 it was Dragonetti vs. Travis Exum (4th and 5th seeds). I *know* Travis is very good and I was very curious to see how he might deal with this "Dragon". Being both generally defensive, they got called for non-combativity and the bout went fairly quickly. I wasn't sure if Travis could beat him, but was surprised when he lost 7-1.
Travis (R) and Dragonetti (L) |
There was a minor upset in the other semifinal. David Jensen (7th seed) beat Sean Ameli (3rd). So the final bout would not be, as Trip had put it, "another Ameli-Dragonetti bout" (I didn't know this was a common occurence!). I kind of wanted to see someone put this dragon down, but thought Ameli was probably more likely to have done it than Jensen—although I knew next to nothing about Jensen. Anyway, as with other Dragonetti bouts, there was non-combativity and things went fast. Jensen did better than I expected, getting to a 4-4 tie before time ran out (veteran DE bouts are to 10 points, but these guys were being *very* cautious). So, sudden death overtime. Priority went to Jensen! Dragonetti used nearly the full minute of overtime before landing a hit and winning, 5-4. Man. "Dragon" indeed.
Mikol (L) and Dragonetti (R) |